MILLIONS logo
Watch the full interview

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS Schlyde into Sports interview on SEC upsets

5 min read

Key takeaways

  • DUMPING GROUND SPORTS argued that Texas should consider another quarterback option while Arch Manning struggled.
  • DUMPING GROUND SPORTS predicted that at least five SEC teams could make the playoff despite the conference’s losses.
  • DUMPING GROUND SPORTS welcomed the AP poll shake-up and said NIL had not eliminated college football upsets.
  • DUMPING GROUND SPORTS thought a backup quarterback could strengthen Jeremiah Smith’s Heisman case.
  • DUMPING GROUND SPORTS described Kentucky’s progress as the product of sustained work, not overnight success.

The DUMPING GROUND SPORTS Schlyde into Sports interview turned from a shaken-up Associated Press poll to Texas’s handling of Arch Manning and the Southeastern Conference playoff race. DUMPING GROUND SPORTS welcomed the upsets, argued that Texas should consider another quarterback and predicted that at least five SEC teams could make the playoff.

What did DUMPING GROUND SPORTS say about college football upsets and the AP poll?

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS liked the balance created by a weekend in which five of the Associated Press poll’s top eight teams lost. Seeing BYU rise in the new poll stood out to them, as did the opportunity for teams such as Utah to benefit when higher-ranked programs stumble.

BYU’s rise and the SEC’s room to recover

BYU’s position was a welcome sight for DUMPING GROUND SPORTS, who said they could not remember the last time the school had been ranked so high. They also liked that the losses had changed the shape of the rankings rather than leaving the same teams in familiar positions.

The SEC, in their view, has more time than other conferences to recover from a loss because of the strength of its schedule. That does not make the upsets less meaningful. They saw the unsettled standings as part of what made the season compelling.

Why NIL has not removed upsets

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS did not think money in the NIL landscape had eliminated surprise results. Their view was that the competition had become more balanced as players pursued opportunities and more teams became capable of winning. Even with substantial spending by some programs, they enjoyed seeing upsets remain part of college football.

What did DUMPING GROUND SPORTS say about Keelan Russell and Miami?

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS was impressed by Keelan Russell’s downfield passing despite what they called a letdown game against Tennessee. They also followed Miami’s rivalry game closely, saying they had wanted a significant win for Mike Novell during a difficult stretch for his program.

Russell’s Tennessee performance did not change their broader assessment of his play. DUMPING GROUND SPORTS said quarterbacks will have games like that occasionally and described Russell as a passer who had otherwise been sending the ball downfield exceptionally well.

On Miami, their attention extended to the opposing sideline. They said Novell had endured tough losses and was under considerable pressure, so a win in that rivalry would have helped his program. They had hoped to see him get that result.

The conversation then moved from that coaching pressure to Texas, where another run of losses raised a different question: whether sticking with a highly regarded quarterback was helping the team.

What did DUMPING GROUND SPORTS say about Arch Manning at Texas?

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS argued that Texas should consider a change at quarterback rather than continue with Arch Manning regardless of his performances. They believed another option deserved a look and said the criticism Manning was receiving was unlikely to help him.

The case for trying another quarterback

Texas’s losses to Florida and Oklahoma brought the issue into focus. DUMPING GROUND SPORTS described coach Sark’s approach as an “Archmanon experiment,” using the phrase while arguing that the team was riding with Manning for too long. They said they did not know who the backup was, but felt it was worth finding out what another quarterback could do.

Their criticism came with an acknowledgment of Manning’s reputation. They noted that he had been highly touted coming out of high school, then said his current play had been poor. In their view, continuing on the same course risked making a difficult situation worse for both Manning and Texas.

They also worried about the effect of the attention on Manning himself. DUMPING GROUND SPORTS said the criticism coming from others was not helping his case, even as they maintained that Texas needed to consider a different look on the field.

How did DUMPING GROUND SPORTS assess the SEC race and playoff bids?

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS saw an unusually open SEC race, with Kentucky’s progress and the finishes of several contenders still to watch. Despite the losses across the conference, they expected its schedule strength to leave room for multiple playoff teams.

Kentucky’s work over time

Kentucky’s place in the discussion did not strike them as an overnight development. DUMPING GROUND SPORTS credited work done over time and said the program had remained supportive of its coach. They wanted to see whether that progress would carry through the rest of the conference race.

They were also interested in how Lane Kiffer and Alabama would finish the season. With teams taking losses and results proving hard to predict from one week to the next, they did not present the SEC standings as settled.

The five-team playoff prediction

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS expected the conference to remain well represented in the playoff even after its chaotic stretch. They put their prediction plainly:

I think you're still gonna see at least five SEC teams in the playoffs.

That was a forecast, not a claim that any team had secured a place. Their reasoning rested on the conference’s strong schedule and the time its teams would have to recover as the season continued.

What did DUMPING GROUND SPORTS say about Jeremiah Smith and Ohio State?

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS disagreed with the argument that a change at quarterback would end Jeremiah Smith’s Heisman chances. They believed a backup looking for a reliable target might turn to Smith more often, potentially making his value to Ohio State clearer rather than diminishing it.

They framed the question from the backup quarterback’s perspective: when unsure where to go with the ball, they would look for Smith. For that reason, DUMPING GROUND SPORTS thought a quarterback change could help Smith’s case. It was their assessment of how the offense might respond, not a prediction of an award result.

They also viewed Ohio State and Indiana as the leading teams in their conference race and anticipated a consequential meeting if those teams reached the conference championship. The road there, they said, would still demand plenty from Ohio State.

Who is Joe Baker?

Joe Baker is a sports content creator who produces commentary, analysis and entertainment. His work reflects an interest in athletes, competition and sports culture.

Watch the full interview

Questions from the interview

Did DUMPING GROUND SPORTS want Texas to replace Arch Manning?

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS said Texas should try another quarterback option rather than continue relying on Arch Manning through his poor performances. They did not identify a preferred replacement.

How many SEC teams did DUMPING GROUND SPORTS predict for the playoff?

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS predicted that at least five SEC teams would make the playoff.

Did DUMPING GROUND SPORTS think NIL had ended college football upsets?

No. DUMPING GROUND SPORTS said the NIL landscape had not removed upsets and felt that increased balance had left more teams capable of winning.

Could a backup quarterback hurt Jeremiah Smith’s Heisman chances?

DUMPING GROUND SPORTS thought a backup quarterback could help Jeremiah Smith’s Heisman case by looking for him more often and highlighting his value to Ohio State.

In this interview

More from Schlyde into Sports